patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Kline Calls Connecticut Tragedy 'Unthinkable,' But Stays Mum on Gun Legislation

The second district's Congressman John Kline has been a consistent supporter of gun rights.

 

Congressman John Kline has issued a statement of sympathy for the families of a Connecticut town struggling to cope with a school shooting on Friday that left 26 people dead, including 20 children—but so far, the incident has not prompted Kline to reconsider his position on the issue of gun control.

“As new details continue to emerge about the tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut, one thing remains certain: a community–and a nation–have been forever changed by an unthinkable act. My thoughts and prayers remain with the students and staff at Sandy Hook Elementary, as well as their friends and family, in this time of grief,” Kline said in a brief statement released Monday.

In the wake of the tragedy, some conservatives, including West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin and former Congressman and GOP Pundit Joe Scarborough, have reversed their former position.

"Entertainment moguls do not have an absolute right to glorify murder while spreading mayhem in young minds across America," said Scarborough, who was given the highest rating by the National Rifle Association during all four terms in Congress. "And our Bill of Rights does not guarantee gun manufacturers the absolute right to sell military-styled high-caliber semi-automatic combat assault rifles with high capacity magazines to whoever the hell they want." 

Like Scraborough, Kline has been regarded by gun lobbyists as a solid supporter. The NRA endorsed Kline in the recent election and donated to $2,500 to his campaign over the last two years. Kline has also received an A rating from Gun Owners of America.

The NRA cited Kline's “proven record of defending the Second Amendment,” as their reason for supporting his bid for re-election.

In November of 2011, Kline co-sponsored H.R. 822, “The National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act of 2011,” which would authorize citizens with valid concealed handgun permits to carry a concealed handgun in any other state that does not prohibit concealed carry. In 2010, Kline co-sponsored a resolution commending the NRA's Eddie Eagle GunSafe Program for "teaching 23,000,000 children its lifesaving message" and encouraging educators in elementary schools to incorporate gun education programs in elementary school curricula to help decrease the incidence of accidental gun-related deaths among children.

Kline also co-sponsored the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act protecting gunmakers and sellers from civil liability pertaining to suits based on misuse of a firearm, and in 2003, he cosponsored H.R. 1036, loosening restrictions on interstate gun purchases.

As of this week, CBS News reports that popular support for gun control is the highest it has been in 10 years, with 57 percent of those polled saying gun control laws should be tightened, while 34 percent think that the status quo is sufficient. Nine percent think gun laws should be loosened. There is talk of renewing a 1990s-era ban on assault weapons that expired in 2004.

  • In the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting, should federal gun laws be changed?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes, they need to be tighter.
        7 (63%)
    • No, current laws are good enough.
        1 (9%)
    • They should be less restrictive.
        0 (0%)
    • The weapons ban in schools should be lifted and teachers should be armed.
        3 (27%)
    Total votes: 11
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Gun Laws and Newton Shootings

Jennifer

12:10 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012

So what I've learned from this article is that John Kline has sided firmly with special interests instead of our children. If this man does not not support the renewal of a newer, tougher, assault weapons ban, then he has no business representing the families in this area. It's unconscionable that guns of that magnitude are sold all over including Walmart! It's harder to get a driver's license and register and insure a car than it is to buy a deadly weapon whose only purpose for existence is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest possible time.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Clare Kennedy

12:41 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Some people are actually arguing that this wouldn't have happened if gun laws were laxer. In fact, Ron Paul put forward a proposal in 2011 that would lift the weapons ban in schools (112th CONGRESS, 1st Session, H. R. 2613
To repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and amendments to that Act"). It didn't get far, since the bill was referred to committee, but it's still something that people on the libertarian right have been discussing for a long time.

Reply

Jennifer

12:48 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Yes, because more guns that can be left unsecured in more homes with more children and teachers distracted by actual teaching to monitor their "classroom gun" is a brilliant idea. Really?

Reply

rural55027

9:06 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Jennifer, Clearly you feel very strongly about this. I appreciate your feelings. I am just as devastated by the deaths in Conneticut as anyone. As a gun owner and an American I too have strong feelings about my constitutional rights. Congressman Kline represents myself and all those that believe in the Right to Bear Arms. Congressman Kline is doing his job representing his constituents on this issue. Until our rights are taken from us I expect Congressman Kline to continue to vote in a manner that upholds the constitution.
Perhaps we can see some legislation to make it easier for the mentally ill to be taken care of. Perhaps gun training as a requirement to ownership. Perhaps all gun owners should be required to have a gun safe and a secure combination. The Conneticut shooter was clearly known to be odd yet had access to his mothers guns. A locked gun safe may have kept them out of his hands. Cool heads & common sense need to prevail.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Barb Johnson

2:37 am on Monday, December 24, 2012

When I read the second amendment.....all 27 words....not just the last 13 taken out of context......I'm wondering if our forefathers would consider assault weapons part of a well regulated militia.

Ken Lehman

11:08 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Jennifer, I can agree that you shouldn't leave guns laying around for them to fall in the wrong hands. But to say John sides with special interest over children is just political rhetoric. If you disagree with John do so honestly and realistically. Have a talk or contact John in email and let him know what you think. I can agree with some points with people who don't want guns around but someone has to fight back against violence. Better yet see beyond political rhetoric to prevent the violence when possible.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jennifer

2:37 am on Monday, December 24, 2012

I have contacted John Kline several times. Believe me, this isn't rhetoric. There is an opportunity here to turn around this situation and instead, he has put the interest of a special interest group ahead of the interest of children. If he backs legislation that confronts mental health (which I agree needs to be a part of this conversation) and also much, much stricter controls on who can purchase a gun (longer waiting periods, closing the gun show loophole, and perhaps having stricter restrictions on assault weapons) then I would consider that a step in the right direction. But John Kline's record does not show that those are his priorities.

Rosco

11:08 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012

John Kline is a lap dog for the NRA. The NRA is nothing more than a propaganda organization financed by weapons/ammunition manufacturers to create fear.

I don't believe taking guns away from those who legally obtained them is the answer but forcing children to go to school with armed guards isn't the answer either. The Fort Hood massacre happened on a military base so, clearly more guns isn't the answer.

John Kline doesn't want people to have any health care (mental or otherwise). He sure enjoys his tax payer funded "socialist" health care but doesn't want the rest of us to have it.

Anyone who has voted for John Kline needs to accept the responsibility of his awful decisions. He doesn't work for his constituents, rather, the lobbyists and special interest groups financed by the 1% and corporations.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jennifer

2:37 am on Monday, December 24, 2012

Agreed. He has made sure that he has access to medical care and mental health care yet would deny other Americans, especially those in greatest need. When you support measures like that, incidents like this are the result. We can no longer make medical and mental health a luxury. It's a necessity for all, and if we don't start taking care of each other and making sure that everyone who needs evaluation and care gets it, we will have more of these situations. Mental health issues are the match, and access to assault rifles is the spark. Politicians need to wake up and THINK instead of appeasing special interests.

Comment_arrow

matt lehman

2:37 am on Monday, December 24, 2012

Rosco, seriously? Like Obama isn't SEIU funded. Kline is a good man, his record shows it. Its solutions not blame.

Michele

11:08 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012

I don't like hearing an elected official use the word "unthinkable." It's their job to be THINKING about it. While I would like to see all handguns and automatic weapons taken out of the hands of civilians, I commend rural 55027 for a thoughtful attitude and a willingness to find a common ground. It's probably the most realistic approach. I do want to suggest that the weapons industry has had years to regulate itself, and has failed to do so.

Reply

Doreen Machin

2:37 am on Monday, December 24, 2012

Let's look at the other picture of mental illness & what can be done to recognize & maybe change some laws where more intervention in getting help for individuals that are on the edge of snapping. I think the ACLU got some laws passed of your civil rights & if you are committed can only be held for 72 hours & you can have yourself released without having enough time for evaluation of your mental state of mind. It seems it is young men age that are doing these evil crimes. If a family has guns & recognize a troubled person in your household wouldn't you think you would lock up all guns, wouldn't these thoughts go through your head? Some people either don't have enough common sense or are to lapse in judgement to think of what if this person would snap & cause danger. My thoughts.

Reply

matt lehman

2:37 am on Monday, December 24, 2012

The United states is and has armed many nations with automatic and semi automatic weapons in defense of ruthless dictators or being harmed in general, Syria is a prime example. Our armed forces can protect our skies, our borders, and our seas however, if our military was ever overrun, the military, our citizens, and the security of the country would be at mercy of its people, willing to fight and die for the country. I support a ban on any weapon including guns that load, aim, and fire without a human being in direct control, this includes unmanned drones over American soil. We have seen in Libya, Syria, Iraq, and many other countries that at times governments do go over the line against their own people, we in this country have a right to defend against such a government and doing so with a single shot 22 is an insult to the intelligence of the American citizen and a violation of the constitutions protections. obviously armed police in schools is the fix for schools but, fact is, many schools or cities cant afford it right? Prioritize your school and city spending, public safety should be first. we will have budget cuts in our military and a weaker defense of the nation, to ask or tell me I am not allowed to reasonably defend my country or state is unacceptable. Its clear so SAY IT!, the left want us disarmed us by January, if they wanted the schools secured cops would be in schools like many currently are including my city.
continued next page.

Reply

matt lehman

2:37 am on Monday, December 24, 2012

start SAYING IT like it is! Obama wants action on gun laws in January, hell he had a full 4 years to deal with the budgets and over a year to address the debt cliff and did nothing, obviously his priorities are backwards, he is putting taking guns from law abiding people ahead of securing the nations finances and future, SAY IT ! This administration is fast tracking taking our guns while illegally giving automatic and semi automatic weapons to Mexican drug cartels, against the better judgment of sellers and existing laws to use against our own border agents and ranchers SAY IT! The left say they want less innocent blood spilled, denying the people constitutional rights is how Syria became an out of control slaughter, you want innocent blood spilled, abolish the constitution, SAY IT! Its time for all responsible parties to start SAYING the truth, the people need to hear it, the government need to hear it and we the people need to demand our rights, all of them! We need trained armed people in schools and at all mass population gatherings. We use 1.3 cops per 1000 citizen population ratio in cities , with the number of students in a school we should have a cop in schools

Reply

matt lehman

2:37 am on Monday, December 24, 2012

We need our government to work for its people, get a budget passed, cut spending 5% across the board and raise taxes 2% across the board, debt cliff solved, certainty and jobs created. We need families to be responsible for each other, helping each other teach our children the traditional values sorely missing today. When our leaders show these values, maybe the population will follow and be more united. Gun control and taking of rights are excuses to failed leadership on both side of the aisle. We the people are the government and WE need to fix this!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rosco

1:37 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012

When you say "traditional" values are you talking about binding women's feet as well as raping little boys and giving your 9 year old girls to old men to marry? Those are "traditional" values and still practiced in "Traditional" thinking areas of the world. You should be thinking forward not backward.

You, Matt are a perfect example of those who have taken the words from the NRA hook, line and sinker. If you live in fear as the NRA teaches, I pity you.

Comment_arrow

Doreen Machin

1:37 pm on Monday, December 24, 2012

To Matt Lehman, Amen! This is the truth what you are saying & they won't say it! This will be a good excuse for this President to just sign an Executive Order like he has on almost 1,000 Executive Orders & has by-passed Congress to make new laws. Heaven forbid if he does this one & I think he can as we have a left wing Media & voters that will give him another free pass to govern to transform this country of what we have never seen & the picture won't be good. No budget passed in his four years of office & no one bats an eye. If any other President would of managed this country like this they would be Impeached. Harry Reid stands there & lies that the GOP is the problem, they have over 30 jobs bills they passed & goes to him & he just tables them & does not bring them to a vote on the Senate side & then stands there & lies to the public & some of We the People believe him. Where are we now on a $4 million HI trip at taxpayers expense for the Holidays while we are going over the fiscal cliff. They are all to blame for this one, many recessess & vacations all summer & yes it was important to recess to Campaign again for their career politician seats for November election. Sorry, but Matt's article bought more thoughts from me.

Leave a comment